Judul : Some Thoughts On The Main Event
link : Some Thoughts On The Main Event
Some Thoughts On The Main Event
For the first time in, like forever, I watched a whole lot of the WSOP main event this year. Although one of the things that got me into poker was seeing some televised poker, I really haven't spent a lot of time watching the game on TV since I actually started playing myself.
I did watch some of the November 9 coverage last year, mostly because I was recovering from my triple by-pass and I didn't have a lot of other things I could do to keep me busy or entertained. Even so, the time of the coverage meant I didn't see all that much of it, and missed the critical moments of the coverage, including the final hand (hey, I couldn't stay up forever, I needed my sleep).
But this time I watched a lot, including the entire final table. I kind of surprised myself with how much I watched.
I definitely feel the change in the way they covered it on TV had a lot to do with my watching so much. I really liked the fact that they had live coverage on ESPN or ESPN2 virtually every day. So much better than the canned, tape delay shows of hands months after they took place. It kept me interested in following the progress of the players. I didn't subscribe to PokerGo, but watching a few hours of the main event every day kept me interested and enhanced the stories I was following online.
When the final table started Thursday night, I was familiar with all the players and the big story lines. And thus watched every bit of it.
So first off, congratulations to all the final 9 and of course most of all to Scott Blumstein for an incredible main event run. He is a worthy champion and bracelet winner.
Blumstein played great of course. To my non-expert eye, however, I think the best player at the final table, and certainly of the final three, was Benjamin Pollak, but what do I know? He just couldn't get the cards to cooperate.
And runner up Dan Ott picked a terrible time to become totally card dead, didn't he? Once it was heads up, Blumstein seemed to get the better cards time after time after time.
I will say I think Ott made one of the worst plays at the final table, when he shoved with King-9 after Pollak's shove. As soon as I saw his hand after Pollak's all-in, I thought to myself, "No way he's calling, he has to fold." Of course, he did indeed shove. All the commentators agreed that it was a bad play on Ott's part. Lay it down there, hope Blumstein calls and knocks Pollak out, and get heads up without risking another chip.
But no, he shoved, Blumstein called both with Ace-Queen, and Ott managed to get to showdown with the best hand when a King hit the flop. I tweeted this out at the time: "Ott's all in there was terrible yet he was rewarded for it. #skillgame. #WSOPMainEvent."
Just my opinion of course.
And what can I say about the awesome John Hesp that hasn't already been said? The 64-year-old Englishman was a delight to watch, and made for some real entertainment. Everyone is saying he helped bring back fun to poker. It was so refreshing to see someone just out there having a great time playing, wasn't it? No doubt he was good for the game. Hopefully the sheer joy he exhibited while playing will become contagious.
I had a couple of observations watching so many hands. The first was that, for long stretches, I wondered why everyone at the table was playing like me! And by that I mean nitty. Seriously, I saw a whole lot of really, really tight play. They were folding hands that I would play! I dunno if it was the pressure of such a big moment, or if my style of play is catching on. I kind of think it is the former.
The other thing is that, well, everyone was card dead! I mean I couldn't believe how many bad hands there were. It just seemed like there were very few premium hands delivered to the players. Take the first night. We saw pocket Queens dealt three or four times in the first couple of hours (and every time to Hesp if memory serves), but I remember thinking that it took forever for someone to wake up with pocket Aces or pocket Kings (once each on the first night I'm guessing). And I don't think anyone ever had pocket Jacks.
And once heads up play started, as Norman Chad pointed out, there were no pocket pairs to either player for almost the entire run of it. It was only the second to last hand that pocket 6's were the first pocket pair dealt. I don't recall a whole lot of Ace-Kings either.
It seems when I play a tournament, I'm seeing pocket pairs, and even premium pairs, shown by players all the time. It struck me as odd. Maybe it's because in a tournament I play in, I don't see all the cards and am maybe assuming they have big hands when they don't.
Whenever I do watch TV poker, I try to use it as a learning experience as much as possible. I was happy that I correctly predicted what Antonio Esfandiari would say about a situation a lot of the time. When I couldn't (or guessed wrong), I would listen carefully to his explanation and try to make a big mental note of it.
That said, I'm not sure how much I will be to incorporate into my game. The issue is, he is basing his thinking on opponents playing at a certain level—a level high enough to run deep into the main event. I'm not sure most of the players I face in the $125 tournaments I play are using the same thought process these players were. When Antonio explains why a bet or a check means a player couldn't have X, I know in the games I play, there's at least a 50/50 chance the player could exactly have X. Still, it was great to hear the thinking of a successful pro.
Oh, and what was with all the ridiculous slow play of some of the players, Damian Salas in particular? I don't mind taking your time in a tough spot, but Salas seemed to be stalling, sitting there tanking on no-brainer plays. I mean, if you have 7-2 and there's been a raise and a three-bet, couldn't you just fold instantly instead of taking 10 seconds to stare into space before the inevitable fold? Seriously, that's bad for the game.
Anyway, this was definitely the most TV poker I've watched in a short period ever. And I really enjoyed it, and maybe it brought my enthusiasm for poker back some.
Good show, WSOP and ESPN.
Oh, and how about that deuce on the river?
Demikianlah Artikel Some Thoughts On The Main Event
Sekianlah artikel Some Thoughts On The Main Event kali ini, mudah-mudahan bisa memberi manfaat untuk anda semua. baiklah, sampai jumpa di postingan artikel lainnya.
Anda sekarang membaca artikel Some Thoughts On The Main Event dengan alamat link http://cappanella.blogspot.com/2017/07/some-thoughts-on-main-event.html